Skip to content

Early Black Friday: +100 bonus credits on the First Film Pack.Early Black Friday A one-time Black Friday bonus, one per account, at the standard US$ price.

Get +100 bonus credits
Tutorials

Original study · Data version 2026-09-26

AI Video Model Benchmark 2026

Speed, cost and success rate, measured on 787 real production jobs.

FXI StudioPublished September 26, 2026Updated October 29, 2026

The short answer

Across 337 AI video jobs FXI Studio ran between June 28, 2026 and September 26, 2026, MiniMax H3 Turbo was the fastest model (median 7 s, n=30) and Grok Imagine Video the most reliable (100% success, n=45). Seedance-family models were the slowest and failed most often (66.7% success across 48 jobs), mostly on the model's own content and copyright checks. Most runs in this window came from FXI's own production and QA work; all figures are measured job outcomes.

Jobs measured
787
Video jobs
337
Window
90 days
Image jobs
450

Try this prompt

“A hummingbird hovers over a bright orange flower in a sunlit garden, wings a soft blur. Slow push-in, shallow depth of field, warm morning light.”

Make this — free

Opens the studio with this prompt filled in · 65 free credits

At a glance

Speed against price.

Median generation time vs price per clip

MiniMax H3 Turbo, P-Video and Grok Imagine Video are faster and cheaper than the average ranked video model (median 2 min 24 s, $1.11 a clip). Seedance 2.0 is the most expensive at $3.00 a clip, with a median of 4 min 57 s. Bubble area is jobs run; colour is success rate.

  • 95%+ success
  • 85–95% success
  • Under 85% success
  • Bubble area = jobs run
Median generation time against price per clip for each ranked AI video model
View the data as a table
Median generation time, price per clip, success rate and job count for each ranked AI video model
ModelMedian timePrice / 5s clipSuccessJobsFaster + cheaper than avg
MiniMax H3 Turbo7 s$0.88100%30Yes
P-Video16 s$0.6396.2%105Yes
Grok Imagine Video51 s$0.75100%45Yes
Seedance 2.0 Mini2 min 38 s$0.6365%20No
FLUX 3 Video · Draft3 min 9 s$0.5082.2%45No
FLUX 3 Video4 min 50 s$1.3891.3%23No
Seedance 2.04 min 57 s$3.0067.9%28No

Results · Video

Every video model with 20+ jobs.

Sorted by volume. Price is FXI’s current list price for a 5-second clip; USD uses the Creator plan rate ($0.025 per credit; Studio works out to $0.013). Success shows the rate and its 95% interval, because small samples deserve wide error bars.

AI video models with at least 20 jobs: price, generation time, success rate and job count
ModelCredits / 5s clip≈ USD / 5s clipMedian timep90 timeSuccessnBest for
P-Video25$0.6316 s37 s96.2%90.6%–98.5%105Fast utility transitions and first-frame/last-frame in-betweens. Not the pick for story scenes.
FLUX 3 Video · Draft20$0.503 min 9 s5 min 11 s82.2%68.7%–90.7%45Cheap long-take drafts (up to 20 s) before paying for a full render.
Grok Imagine Video30$0.7551 s67 s100%92.1%–100%45Quick five-second single-shot motion tests with a predictable turnaround.
MiniMax H3 Turbo35$0.887 s12 s100%88.6%–100%30The cheapest, fastest preview for blocking an idea.
Seedance 2.0120$3.004 min 57 s10 min 39 s67.9%49.3%–82.1%28Hero shots with synchronized audio and multi-reference direction.
FLUX 3 Video55$1.384 min 50 s9 min 5 s91.3%73.2%–97.6%23Long single takes up to 20 s at 720p when the draft is approved.
Seedance 2.0 Mini25$0.632 min 38 s3 min 52 s65%43.3%–81.9%20First-pass drafts of Director film scenes, frame-chained shot to shot.

Price by clip length, resolution and minute

Video is billed per second, times a resolution multiplier where sharper output costs more, with a per-clip minimum on some models: the same rules your account is charged by. A dash means the model cannot render that length. Per minute assumes clips of the model’s longest single render. Rates as of October 29, 2026.

  • P-Video

    up to 20 s a clip

    720p
    5 cr/s5 s 2510 s 5015 s 75
    300/min
    1080p×2
    10 cr/s5 s 5010 s 10015 s 150
    600/min

  • FLUX 3 Video · Draft

    up to 20 s a clip

    720p
    4 cr/s5 s 2010 s 4015 s 60
    240/min

  • Grok Imagine Video

    up to 15 s a clip · 1 s minimum

    480p
    6 cr/s5 s 3010 s 6015 s 90
    360/min
    720p
    6 cr/s5 s 3010 s 6015 s 90
    360/min

  • MiniMax H3 Turbo

    up to 15 s a clip · 5 s minimum

    480p
    7 cr/s5 s 3510 s 7015 s 105
    420/min
    768p
    7 cr/s5 s 3510 s 7015 s 105
    420/min

  • Seedance 2.0

    up to 15 s a clip · 4 s minimum

    480p
    24 cr/s5 s 12010 s 24015 s 360
    1,440/min
    720p
    24 cr/s5 s 12010 s 24015 s 360
    1,440/min
    1080p×2.25
    54 cr/s5 s 27010 s 54015 s 810
    3,240/min

  • FLUX 3 Video

    up to 20 s a clip

    720p
    11 cr/s5 s 5510 s 11015 s 165
    660/min
    1080p
    11 cr/s5 s 5510 s 11015 s 165
    660/min

  • Seedance 2.0 Mini

    up to 15 s a clip · 4 s minimum

    480p
    5 cr/s5 s 2510 s 5015 s 75
    300/min
    720p
    5 cr/s5 s 2510 s 5015 s 75
    300/min

  • Gemini Omni Flash 1.1

    up to 10 s a clip · 4 s minimum · +13 cr a clip

    720p
    6.25 cr/s5 s —10 s 7615 s —
    456/min
    1080p×1.5
    9.38 cr/s5 s —10 s 11415 s —
    684/min

  • Seedance 2.0 Fast

    up to 15 s a clip · 4 s minimum

    480p
    15 cr/s5 s 7510 s 15015 s 225
    900/min
    720p
    15 cr/s5 s 7510 s 15015 s 225
    900/min

  • Match Motion (Wan 2.2 VACE)

    up to 15 s a clip · 5 s minimum

    480p×0.5
    6 cr/s5 s 3010 s 6015 s 90
    360/min
    580p×0.75
    9 cr/s5 s 4510 s 9015 s 135
    540/min
    720p
    12 cr/s5 s 6010 s 12015 s 180
    720/min

  • MiniMax H3 Max

    up to 10 s a clip · 5 s minimum

    480p×0.6
    6 cr/s5 s 3010 s 6015 s —
    360/min
    768p
    10 cr/s5 s 5010 s 10015 s —
    600/min

  • Grok Imagine Video 1.5

    longest clip not listed

    720p
    10 cr/s5 s 5010 s 10015 s 150
    —

  • PixVerse V6 Reference

    up to 15 s a clip · 1 s minimum

    540p×0.78
    3.9 cr/s5 s 2010 s 3915 s 59
    236/min
    720p
    5 cr/s5 s 2510 s 5015 s 75
    300/min
    1080p×2
    10 cr/s5 s 5010 s 10015 s 150
    600/min

  • LTX 2.5 Fast

    up to 20 s a clip

    720p
    4 cr/s5 s 2010 s 4015 s 60
    240/min
    1080p×2
    8 cr/s5 s 4010 s 8015 s 120
    480/min
    1440p×4
    16 cr/s5 s 8010 s 16015 s 240
    960/min
    4k×8
    32 cr/s5 s 16010 s 32015 s 480
    1,920/min

  • Seedance 2.5

    up to 30 s a clip · 4 s minimum

    480p
    38 cr/s5 s 19010 s 38015 s 570
    2,280/min
    720p
    38 cr/s5 s 19010 s 38015 s 570
    2,280/min

Generation time

Median bar, whisker out to the 90th percentile; shorter is faster. MiniMax H3 Turbo is quickest at a median 7 s; Seedance 2.0 is slowest at 4 min 57 s (p90 10 min 39 s).

Median and 90th-percentile generation time by AI video modelMiniMax H3 Turbo: median 7 s, 90th percentile 12 s, from 30 successful jobs. P-Video: median 16 s, 90th percentile 37 s, from 101 successful jobs. Grok Imagine Video: median 51 s, 90th percentile 67 s, from 45 successful jobs. Seedance 2.0 Mini: median 2 min 38 s, 90th percentile 3 min 52 s, from 13 successful jobs. FLUX 3 Video · Draft: median 3 min 9 s, 90th percentile 5 min 11 s, from 37 successful jobs. FLUX 3 Video: median 4 min 50 s, 90th percentile 9 min 5 s, from 21 successful jobs. Seedance 2.0: median 4 min 57 s, 90th percentile 10 min 39 s, from 19 successful jobs.MiniMax H3 Turbo: median 7 s, 90th percentile 12 s, from 30 successful jobs.MiniMax H3 Turbo7 sP-Video: median 16 s, 90th percentile 37 s, from 101 successful jobs.P-Video16 sGrok Imagine Video: median 51 s, 90th percentile 67 s, from 45 successful jobs.Grok Imagine Video51 sSeedance 2.0 Mini: median 2 min 38 s, 90th percentile 3 min 52 s, from 13 successful jobs.Seedance 2.0 Mini2 min 38 sFLUX 3 Video · Draft: median 3 min 9 s, 90th percentile 5 min 11 s, from 37 successful jobs.FLUX 3 Video · Draft3 min 9 sFLUX 3 Video: median 4 min 50 s, 90th percentile 9 min 5 s, from 21 successful jobs.FLUX 3 Video4 min 50 sSeedance 2.0: median 4 min 57 s, 90th percentile 10 min 39 s, from 19 successful jobs.Seedance 2.04 min 57 s
View the data as a table
Median and 90th-percentile generation time by AI video model
ModelMedianp90Successful jobs
MiniMax H3 Turbo7 s12 s30
P-Video16 s37 s101
Grok Imagine Video51 s67 s45
Seedance 2.0 Mini2 min 38 s3 min 52 s13
FLUX 3 Video · Draft3 min 9 s5 min 11 s37
FLUX 3 Video4 min 50 s9 min 5 s21
Seedance 2.04 min 57 s10 min 39 s19

Success rate

Share of jobs that delivered a file, with the 95% Wilson interval. Grok Imagine Video leads at 100% (n=45); Seedance 2.0 Mini trails at 65% (n=20).

Success rate by AI video model with 95% confidence intervalGrok Imagine Video: 45 of 45 jobs succeeded, 100%; 95% interval 92.1% to 100%. MiniMax H3 Turbo: 30 of 30 jobs succeeded, 100%; 95% interval 88.6% to 100%. P-Video: 101 of 105 jobs succeeded, 96.2%; 95% interval 90.6% to 98.5%. FLUX 3 Video: 21 of 23 jobs succeeded, 91.3%; 95% interval 73.2% to 97.6%. FLUX 3 Video · Draft: 37 of 45 jobs succeeded, 82.2%; 95% interval 68.7% to 90.7%. Seedance 2.0: 19 of 28 jobs succeeded, 67.9%; 95% interval 49.3% to 82.1%. Seedance 2.0 Mini: 13 of 20 jobs succeeded, 65%; 95% interval 43.3% to 81.9%.Grok Imagine Video: 45 of 45 jobs succeeded, 100%; 95% interval 92.1% to 100%.Grok Imagine Video100%MiniMax H3 Turbo: 30 of 30 jobs succeeded, 100%; 95% interval 88.6% to 100%.MiniMax H3 Turbo100%P-Video: 101 of 105 jobs succeeded, 96.2%; 95% interval 90.6% to 98.5%.P-Video96.2%FLUX 3 Video: 21 of 23 jobs succeeded, 91.3%; 95% interval 73.2% to 97.6%.FLUX 3 Video91.3%FLUX 3 Video · Draft: 37 of 45 jobs succeeded, 82.2%; 95% interval 68.7% to 90.7%.FLUX 3 Video · Draft82.2%Seedance 2.0: 19 of 28 jobs succeeded, 67.9%; 95% interval 49.3% to 82.1%.Seedance 2.067.9%Seedance 2.0 Mini: 13 of 20 jobs succeeded, 65%; 95% interval 43.3% to 81.9%.Seedance 2.0 Mini65%
View the data as a table
Success rate by AI video model with 95% confidence interval
ModelSuccess95% intervalJobs
Grok Imagine Video100%92.1%–100%45
MiniMax H3 Turbo100%88.6%–100%30
P-Video96.2%90.6%–98.5%105
FLUX 3 Video91.3%73.2%–97.6%23
FLUX 3 Video · Draft82.2%68.7%–90.7%45
Seedance 2.067.9%49.3%–82.1%28
Seedance 2.0 Mini65%43.3%–81.9%20

What a usable clip really costs

List price divided by success rate is what a usable clip costs if every failed attempt were paid for and re-run. FLUX 3 Video · Draft is cheapest per delivered clip at $0.61; Seedance 2.0 climbs from $3.00 to $4.42. This is a worst case: failures that are refunded bring the real figure down.

  • List price per 5s clip
  • Added by failed attempts
Retry-adjusted price per delivered clip by AI video modelFLUX 3 Video · Draft: list price $0.50, 82.2% success, so about $0.61 per delivered clip (n=45).FLUX 3 Video · Draft$0.61list $0.50P-Video: list price $0.63, 96.2% success, so about $0.65 per delivered clip (n=105).P-Video$0.65list $0.63Grok Imagine Video: list price $0.75, 100% success, so about $0.75 per delivered clip (n=45).Grok Imagine Video$0.75no failuresMiniMax H3 Turbo: list price $0.88, 100% success, so about $0.88 per delivered clip (n=30).MiniMax H3 Turbo$0.88no failuresSeedance 2.0 Mini: list price $0.63, 65% success, so about $0.97 per delivered clip (n=20).Seedance 2.0 Mini$0.97list $0.63FLUX 3 Video: list price $1.38, 91.3% success, so about $1.51 per delivered clip (n=23).FLUX 3 Video$1.51list $1.38Seedance 2.0: list price $3.00, 67.9% success, so about $4.42 per delivered clip (n=28).Seedance 2.0$4.42list $3.00
View the data as a table
List price, success rate and retry-adjusted price per delivered clip by AI video model
ModelList priceSuccessPer delivered clip
FLUX 3 Video · Draft$0.5082.2%$0.61
P-Video$0.6396.2%$0.65
Grok Imagine Video$0.75100%$0.75
MiniMax H3 Turbo$0.88100%$0.88
Seedance 2.0 Mini$0.6365%$0.97
FLUX 3 Video$1.3891.3%$1.51
Seedance 2.0$3.0067.9%$4.42

Results · Image

Image models with 20+ jobs

AI image models with at least 20 jobs: price, generation time, success rate and job count
ModelCredits / image≈ USD / imageMedian timep90 timeSuccessnBest for
Z-Image Turbo2$0.0520 s23 s98.5%95.7%–99.5%199Free, fast drafts and storyboard stills.
Nano Banana Pro18$0.4528 s44 s96.6%91.5%–98.7%117Hero stills where reference fidelity and legible text matter.
Nano Banana 25$0.1339 s2 min 6 s100%92.1%–100%45Everyday edits and consistent-character stills.
Nano Banana 2 Lite3$0.0833 s77 s97.4%86.5%–99.5%38Budget iterations on a still.

Not enough runs to rank (n < 20)

These models ran too few times in the window for a fair comparison. They are in the CSV with their raw counts, but we do not rank them or quote their rates.

  • Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 · n=11
  • Seedance 2.0 Fast · n=10
  • Match Motion (Wan 2.2 VACE) · n=7
  • MiniMax H3 Max · n=6
  • Grok Imagine Video 1.5 · n=3
  • Veo 3.1 Fast · n=1
  • PixVerse V6 Reference · n=1
  • P-Video Animate · n=1
  • LTX 2.5 Fast · n=1
  • Seedance 2.5 · n=0
  • Z-Image Turbo (retired endpoint) · n=13
  • GPT Image 2 · n=10
  • Grok Imagine (image) · n=9
  • Seedream 5 Lite · n=6
  • Nano Banana · n=4
  • FLUX 2 Pro · n=4
  • GPT Image 2.5 · n=4
  • Recraft V4 · n=1

Seedance 2.5 is priced at 190 credits per 5-second clip. It is reserved for an optional, approved final-cut pass on Director films, so it has no production runs yet in this window.

Key findings

What the numbers say.

  1. 7 s

    MiniMax H3 Turbo is the fastest video model we run: median 7 s, p90 12 s across 30 jobs at 35 credits a clip. That makes it the right tool for blocking ideas, not finishing them.

  2. 96.2%

    P-Video carried the most volume (105 jobs) and finished 96.2% of them at a median of 16 s. That speed is why it handles utility transitions; for story scenes, Director films draft in Seedance 2.0 Mini instead.

  3. 12/16

    Seedance failures are mostly policy, not outages. 12 of 16 failed Seedance jobs were rejected by the model’s own content and copyright checks, most often on generated audio. Success across the family was 66.7% (32/48).

  4. 4 min 57 s

    Quality costs minutes. Seedance 2.0 had the slowest median at 4 min 57 s, with a p90 of 10 min 39 s. Budget for it: a six-shot film on the slowest model is a coffee break, not a click.

  5. $4.42

    Failures reprice the list. Divide Seedance 2.0’s $3.00 list price by its 67.9% success rate and a usable clip costs about $4.42 if every failure were paid and re-run. FLUX 3 Video · Draft stays the cheapest delivered clip at $0.61.

  6. 82.2%

    FLUX 3 Video · Draft is cheap but patient. At 20 credits a 5-second clip it is among the lowest prices here, but it took a median 3 min 9 s, and 7 of its 8 failures were jobs that never came back within an hour.

  7. 98.5%

    Stills are the reliable layer. Z-Image Turbo finished 98.5% of 199 images at a median 20 s across 25 accounts. Iterate on stills, lock the frame, then spend video credits once.

Methodology

How we measured it.

Window and sample
June 28, 2026 to September 26, 2026 (90 days). 787 generation jobs: 337 video, 450 image. Every job the generation pipeline dispatched is counted once, whichever model or surface started it.
Who ran the jobs
FXI Studio is live and free to start. Most runs in this window came from FXI's own production and QA work; all figures are measured job outcomes. This is platform production data, not a customer survey, and every job hits the same models, queues and failure modes a customer's does.
Success
A job succeeds when it completes with a stored output file. Failures are jobs marked failed plus jobs still pending an hour after dispatch (never delivered). Jobs still in flight are excluded. Rates carry a 95% Wilson interval.
Generation time
Wall-clock seconds from job dispatch to the stored file, successful jobs only. It includes queueing and any automatic recovery, because that is what a person waiting sees. We report the median and the 90th percentile, not the mean.
Price
Current list price in FXI credits for one 5-second clip (or one image). Duration-priced models are base plus per-second rate times the billed seconds (snapped to the model's length grid and floored at its minimum), times the resolution multiplier where one applies; flat-priced models use their flat price. The rate card prices 5, 10 and 15-second clips and a minute of footage with the same rule. USD uses the Creator plan's $0.025 per credit.
Exclusions and limits
Uploads, imports, re-encodes and marketing fixtures are not generation jobs and are excluded, as are 27 upscaler runs. Models with fewer than 20 jobs are listed but not ranked. Mode variants of one model (text-to-video, image-to-video, keyframes) are pooled, and clip lengths and resolutions vary by job, so times are indicative, not controlled. We do not score visual quality here.

How many runs back each number

695 jobs back the ranked rows. P-Video has the most video runs (n=105, success known to about ±3.9 points); Seedance 2.0 Mini has the fewest (n=20, ±19.3 points), so read its rate as a range, not a point.

  • Delivered
  • Failed
  • Half-width of the 95% interval on success rate
Jobs measured per ranked model, split into delivered and failedP-Video: 105 jobs, 101 delivered and 4 failed; success rate known to within about 3.9 percentage points.P-Videon=105±3.9 ptsFLUX 3 Video · Draft: 45 jobs, 37 delivered and 8 failed; success rate known to within about 11 percentage points.FLUX 3 Video · Draftn=45±11 ptsGrok Imagine Video: 45 jobs, 45 delivered and 0 failed; success rate known to within about 3.9 percentage points.Grok Imagine Videon=45±3.9 ptsMiniMax H3 Turbo: 30 jobs, 30 delivered and 0 failed; success rate known to within about 5.7 percentage points.MiniMax H3 Turbon=30±5.7 ptsSeedance 2.0: 28 jobs, 19 delivered and 9 failed; success rate known to within about 16.4 percentage points.Seedance 2.0n=28±16.4 ptsFLUX 3 Video: 23 jobs, 21 delivered and 2 failed; success rate known to within about 12.2 percentage points.FLUX 3 Videon=23±12.2 ptsSeedance 2.0 Mini: 20 jobs, 13 delivered and 7 failed; success rate known to within about 19.3 percentage points.Seedance 2.0 Minin=20±19.3 ptsZ-Image Turbo: 199 jobs, 196 delivered and 3 failed; success rate known to within about 1.9 percentage points.Z-Image Turbon=199±1.9 ptsNano Banana Pro: 117 jobs, 113 delivered and 4 failed; success rate known to within about 3.6 percentage points.Nano Banana Pron=117±3.6 ptsNano Banana 2: 45 jobs, 45 delivered and 0 failed; success rate known to within about 3.9 percentage points.Nano Banana 2n=45±3.9 ptsNano Banana 2 Lite: 38 jobs, 37 delivered and 1 failed; success rate known to within about 6.5 percentage points.Nano Banana 2 Liten=38±6.5 pts
View the data as a table
Jobs, deliveries, failures and 95% interval half-width for each ranked model
ModelTypeJobsDeliveredFailed± points (95%)
P-VideoVideo10510143.9
FLUX 3 Video · DraftVideo4537811
Grok Imagine VideoVideo454503.9
MiniMax H3 TurboVideo303005.7
Seedance 2.0Video2819916.4
FLUX 3 VideoVideo2321212.2
Seedance 2.0 MiniVideo2013719.3
Z-Image TurboImage19919631.9
Nano Banana ProImage11711343.6
Nano Banana 2Image454503.9
Nano Banana 2 LiteImage383716.5

The numbers are produced by a script that reads FXI’s generation log and writes the dataset behind this page. We refresh it monthly; the data version at the top of the page tells you which cut you are reading.

Cite this

Use the data. Link the source.

Suggested citation

FXI Studio (2026). AI Video Model Benchmark 2026: Speed, Cost and Success Rate (Real Production Data). Data version 2026-09-26, window 2026-06-28 to 2026-09-26. https://www.fxi.studio/tutorials/ai-video-model-benchmark-2026

Last updated
October 29, 2026
License
CC BY 4.0
Download CSV

Frequently asked

The benchmark, answered.

Which AI video model is fastest in 2026?

In FXI Studio's production data (June 28, 2026 to September 26, 2026), MiniMax H3 Turbo was the fastest AI video model with a median of 7 s from submit to finished clip across 30 jobs. P-Video was next at 16 s (n=105). Seedance 2.0 was the slowest, with a median of 4 min 57 s.

Which AI video model fails least often?

Grok Imagine Video completed 45 of 45 jobs (100%). P-Video, the highest-volume model, completed 96.2% of 105. Seedance 2.0 Mini had the lowest success rate at 65% (n=20).

Why do Seedance generations fail?

12 of the 16 failed Seedance jobs in this window were rejected by the model's own content and copyright checks, most often on generated audio. The rest were input or service errors. In our experience, keeping named songs, brands and lookalike voices out of the prompt and Sound line avoids most of them.

How much does a 5-second AI video clip cost?

On FXI Studio's list prices, a 5-second clip ranges from 20 to 120 credits across the benchmarked models, which is about $0.50 to $3.00 at the Creator plan's $0.025 per credit. Larger plans lower the per-credit price.

How much does a minute of AI video cost?

Video is billed per second, so cost scales with length and, on some models, resolution. On FXI Studio's current rates one finished minute costs 236 to 3,240 credits depending on model and resolution, about $5.90 to $81.00 at the Creator plan's rate. Seedance 2.0, for example, is 24 credits a second at 720p, so a minute is 1,440 credits. Per-minute figures assume the minute is cut into clips of each model's longest single render.

How was this AI video benchmark measured?

Every generation job FXI Studio dispatched in a 90-day window was counted. Success means the job finished with a stored file. Time is wall clock from submit to finished file, successful jobs only. Models with fewer than 20 jobs are listed separately and not ranked. Most runs in this window came from FXI's own production and QA work; all figures are measured job outcomes.

Can I use this data?

Yes. The dataset is free to cite and reuse under CC BY 4.0 with attribution to FXI Studio and a link to this page. A CSV download is provided, and the numbers are refreshed monthly; cite the data version (2026-09-26).

Go deeper on a model: the Seedance 2.0 shot-grammar guide, P-Video for seamless transitions, prompting Grok Imagine Video 1.5, when to use MiniMax, frame chaining and camera-move prompt recipes. Every tool is explained in the documentation.

Pick the model for the shot, not the hype.

Every model on this page runs inside FXI Studio, priced before you commit. Start with 65 free credits; plans run $15, $35 and $135 a month.

Make this — freeStart freeSee pricing

Related guides

Looking for a specific tool? Browse the documentation, the guides, or all tutorials.